Blog Hassan

Political Arguments

Sunday, February 19, 2006

Whoever believes rubbish is going to get buried under it (and that goes for me too.) Do I speculate truth or falsehoods? Place your bets Ladies and Gentlemen. The roulette wheel is spinning.

Firstly, The United States military was on the same side as Al Qeada during The Bosnian war. Bill Clinton approved shipments from Islamic Iran to Islamic radicals in Bosnia in 1994. Rep. Benjamin Gilman, chairing a House International Relations Committee hearing about this, said the Clinton administration implemented a secret policy permitting Iran, "the world's leading terrorist state, a rogue state, to ship arms to Bosnia and thus gain a major foothold in the Balkans."

Second, Barbara Olson was an attorney for the Department of Justice, a congressional investigator and a general counsel for the United States Senate. In the early days of the Clinton administration she investigated the firing of employees in White House Travel office, people who had worked there through a number of Presidential administrations. Ms. Olson wanted to know if people had been fired so Mrs. Clinton could give jobs as rewards to political supporters (which would have been illegal.)

In 1999 Barbara Olson wrote a book 'Hell to Pay' where she shows Mrs. Clinton to be a committed Marxist dishonestly passing herself off as a middle of the road Democrat. (I tell everybody get a copy and read it.) Ms. Olson was a commentator on CNN. She was the author of another Clinton expose, ‘The Final Days’, a book detailing, among other things, the flurry of pardons signed by Bill Clinton in his last days in office.

Barbara Olson was on flight 77 that crashed into the Pentagon on Sept. 11, 2001. Because Mrs. Clinton was a well-known supporter of Yassir Arafat (the 'world leader' invited to the While House during the Clinton years more than any other) and therefore one degree of separation from numerous Middle Eastern terrorist organizations, was flight 77 picked because Barbara Olson was on it? Was somebody doing Mrs. Clinton a big favor in getting Barbara Olson out of the way?

Third, somebody calling himself 'Joe Tamboola' befriended me in 2000, expressing serious anti America views and trying to get me to agree with him on this many times. Because of my Middle Eastern sounding last name (Tamsula – Tam is a prefix meaning ‘of Persia’, modern day Iran) and because I was a conscientious objector during the Vietnam War, I have reason to believe Joe was checking me out for possible recruitment by enemies of this country. I also have reason to believe Joe was connected to people in the movie industry and possibly big supporters of The Clintons.

(Hint: The medal ceremony in the first Star Wars movie is reminiscent of the medal ceremony in Leni Reifenstahl’s ‘The Triumph of The Will’.)

And this: Hillary Clinton kisses Suha Arafat on a stage in Ramallah on Veterans Day 11/11/99, 22 months to the day until 9/11.

(Hint: Could something have been 'sealed with a kiss?’ Do terrorists play 'number games' with us? I’ll say they do - The Madrid bombing of 3/11/04 was exactly 911 days from 9/11. And on what day does Yasir Arafat check-out? Veterans Day 11/11/04. I was certain that would be the day he checked out, or at least the day when The Palestinians claimed he did. I should’ve bet the farm in a ghoul pool.)

Anyway, call me suspicious but I can't understand why people don't question what happened to Barbara Olson. If Hunter S. Thompson had been on Flight 77, there'd be a leftwing growth industry around this by now with Michael Mooreon as its CEO.

Final Hint: "However, if what befell the United States is a domestic affair, then the people of the country could diagnose the disease better than others."

- Saddam Hussein. September 11, 2001

A domestic affair? Really. Does ol’ Saddam know more than we do?

Hassan.

PS. Please check out FreedomSite: Auntie Seemite?

Sunday, February 05, 2006

The following email was sent to Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa. 02/05/06


Dear Sen. Specter:

A three star general such as a General Patton would have an intelligence officer on his staff. And in fact, in the European theater of late 1944, General Patton’s intelligence officer, his G-2, supplied information of such relevance that the General anticipated the German breakout that came to be known as the Battle of the Bulge. Among the Allied Commanders, General Patton was alone in having a prepared quick response.

So the idea that a President of the United States, a Commander in Chief, would have more constraints on his intelligence gathering capabilities than a three star general, during a time of war, with this country’s infiltration by combatants, where speed is the difference between success and failure, is a vacation from logic.

Hassan

cc: Tim Russert

Monday, November 21, 2005

Poor Ron Brown

I read this really terrific book recently, 'Ron Brown's Body', by Jack Cashill. (WND Books. 2004). Ron Brown was Bill Clinton's Secretary of Commerce who died in a plane crash in Croatia April 3, 1996, flying into Dubrovnik, Croatia.

Here are some interesting excerpts.


'Immediate payback for Brown came in early spring 1993 in the form of a surprise invitation. Hillary Clinton had invited him to a private luncheon for the two of them on the balcony of the White House.

'"Ron felt very uncomfortable with Hillary," Nolanda Hill (close friend of Brown) recalls. "He did not think she liked him."

'Understandably, this was no small event in Brown's life. But the lunch went well. Hill remembers Brown's good mood because afterwards he picked her up in his chauffeur-driven limousine and joked that Hill and Hillary were wearing the same outfit. As Brown told Hill, Clinton expressed her appreciation for Brown's work in getting her husband elected. More to the point, she thanked him for his help with "Mack McLarty's problem in Oklahoma."'

p. 84 'Ron Brown's Body'


'Brown needed immediate, temporal help as well. This, only the president could provide. And so Brown sought a private meeting with (Bill) Clinton, one-on-one. They had a lot to talk about. Highest on Brown's list of priorities was the fate of (Ron Brown's son) Michael Brown, now just thirty and the father of twins. Brown loved the boy dearly. He could not bear the thought of his son going to jail. He knew it would all but kill Alma (Brown's wife). And he knew finally he was the one responsible. After all, it was he who had involved Michael in Oklahoma. How to explain that even to himself?'

p. 183 'Ron Brown's Body'


'Brown dissented. Without the IRS and the FBI, the independent counsel could not function, he reminded the president. If (Attorney General Janet) Reno wanted to starve the investigation, she could do just that and say no more. Sure, she might have a public relations problem, but Reno loved her job so much she would do just about anything to keep it. This was her weakness, and both Clinton and Brown knew it … '

'When Brown did not get the response he wanted from Clinton, he resorted to his ultimate bargaining chip. If he had to, he told Clinton, he was prepared to reveal the president's treasonous dealing with China, almost none of which had yet to make the news. It was on this subject - the president's ultimate Achilles' heel - that Hill had been focusing Brown.

p. 183 'Ron Brown's Body'


'(Chief Petty Officer Kathleen) Janoski proceeded to test the exposure system on her Nikon F4. By some providential stroke, she did so by shooting (Ron) Brown's X-rays, which were posted on the light box. When ready, she mounted a stepladder and began to photograph the body starting at the head. She had scarcely begun when she saw something that took her breath away.'

"Look at the hole in Brown's head," she exclaimed. "It looks like a bullet hole."

p. 204 'Ron Brown's Body'



‘If Ron Brown were murdered, Hillary's trip to the Balkans makes sense as the kind of "strong signal" the Croatians would need before executing so harrowing a plan. There would be no need for conversation. That would be done through the broker, but a Croatian conspirator would want some powerful reassurance that the planned hit on Brown was authorized by the White House. It is possible, in fact, that Hillary was used to this end without her knowledge.’

p. 289-290 'Ron Brown's Body'


I'm recommending this book to all my friends.
So sayeth Hassan

Monday, September 05, 2005

The following was posted on the AOL message boards 9/5/05

Aaron Broussard, President of Jefferson Parish just south of New Orleans, said on Meet The Press Sunday: 'Bureaucracy has committed murder.' And he's absolutely right.

Mr. Broussard has earned the right to condemn Washington's slow response. Not Michael Moore (the colostomy bag of the American Left), nor the governor of Massachusetts, nor the editor of the New York Post, nor Tim Russert, nor anybody else who couldn’t have done a better job if they were in charge of a relief effort this big. They should all do America a big favor and check their 'look at me' outrage at the door.

Mr. Broussard however has earned this right, and we should listen carefully to what he is saying. Maybe he speaks a truth he doesn't even grasp yet.The Department of Homeland Security (over seeing FEMA) was a terrible idea. When the Congress (not the President) created this new agency, what they did was add more windows to the decision tree, and anybody with eyes should see this would only create slowness when speed is of the essence, especially in a crisis.

Don't blame the President. He was against the idea of a Dept. of Homeland Security in the first place. But since he is a tradition President (most people don't bother to recognize this) his attitude is if the duly elected representatives of the American people, The Congress, can build a consensus for an idea like the Dept. of Homeland Security, he'll go along with it. If the American people want it, they can have it.

Don't blame Michael Chertoff. He's doing the best he can with a decision tree this big. But the bigger the decision tree the slower the response. You get what you bargain for, America.

Blame Joe Lieberman and all the Democrats who backed the creation of The Dept. of Homeland Security. It was their bright idea, an idea that was unnecessary, and idea that was created for totally political reasons, just so the Democrats could bludgeon the President over the head with it if he dared to oppose it. And in hindsight it now seems like a prank that got people killed.

So we have the dead in New Orleans. They should rise and walk up the steps of the Capitol and stop before Joe Lieberman and all the other Democrats who believe more Government bureaucracy is the answer to all our problems.

And they should all say, "Bureaucracy has committed murder."

So Sayeth Hassan







Saturday, August 13, 2005

Kasarin Kuinran is commenting on Tzar Chet's other blog BlogHassan

Dear, sweet Tsar Chet.... you are so blisteringly paranoid. But it doesn't mean conspiracies don't exist, to paraphrase an old saying. The truth is out there, desu yo. Oh, and sorry about your monitor!

Kasarin

Dear Kasarin:

You’re right, but you know, I really have to take exception to being characterized as paranoid. I'll cop to being wrong, but my last name is Tamsula, and a year before 9/11 I was approached by a somebody calling himself Joe Tamboola, a name I have yet to find in any phone directory anywhere.

Tam is a prefix that in some cases means 'Of Persia' (modern day Iran). So the question is, if I have distant Middle Eastern Ancestry and Joe was using a phony name, what was the little bastard up to?

This is where things start. The world in my blog is just a big pile of material, matters of public record, that form up in a particular way, and in that world the presence of Joe Tamboola makes perfect sense. If I'd never met Joe, my blog would not exist.

So in my mind paranoia and conspiracy are X-Files/JFK assassination parlor games. What I'm about has more to do with self-preservation, mine and to some extent my country's. I say, Hey America, take a good look at George Lucas. THX 1138 was his first movie. THX 738 is a license plate in American Graffiti. 11/7/38 was the date of an assassination of a German diplomat in Paris that became the pretext for Kristallnact (the night Nazi storm trooper trashed Jewish businesses all over Germany, which took place on 11/9/38.) 11/7/83 was the day a bomb was set off in The US Capitol Building … I could go on but I think you get the idea. And there’s a phrase for what I'm pointing out. It’s called crypto fascism.

And when I see a bit player at the sock hop sequence in American Graffiti who looks just like Joe Tamboola ... what to do? You'll see whom I'm talking about if you go to 38:32 in American Graffiti. The player is looking right into the camera. Same red hair as Joe. And he's dancing.

And where did I meet Joe? I was working the cash drawer at a swing dance. Oh, how Joe loved to dance.

So if I put everything on a table I've experienced and read in the last five years and look at it, it says one thing. And I put that in my blog. If people don't want to see it, if people want to call me crazy, I don't care. I know what my gut tells me.

Joe couldn't operate out in the open if he didn't have a particular political context as cover. My blog is about that context. If I'm wrong I'm wrong, and Hillary Clinton can claim victim's status once again just like she's been doing for the last ten years. Nothing changes. But if I’m right, I freeze people right down to that little chunk of gristle that hold the halves of one's ass together, because I've exposed Hillary as something exceedingly dangerous - an improbable, migratory politician (if all politics is local) born in Chicago, who worked in Washington as a Jr. council on the Watergate committee, spent 20 years in Arkansas, 8 years in The White House, then was elected Jr. Senator to the State of New York right before the 9/11 attack in NYC. And her profile goes right through the roof. Nobody gets ahead in life without help. The over-arching question is, who, ultimately, is helping her?

And no Barbara Olson to ask troubling questions such as, ‘if JFK Jr. were still alive, isn’t more than likely he’d now be the Jr. Senator from New York?’ Barbara wrote 'Hell to Pay', the Hillary expose; she also wrote the other Clinton expose 'The Final Days' where she revealed, among other things that during the flurry of final pardons before Bill left office, he granted clemency to one Susan Rosenberg, a member of the Weather Underground cell that set off that bomb in The Capitol Building on 11/7/83. (Funny how all this stuff seems to loop back in on itself). Then Ms. Olson, the wife of Solicitor General Ted Olson, found herself on Flight 77 that crashed into the Pentagon on 9/11. Hmmm.

Paranoid? I don't feel paranoid. I'll be the first to admit I could be full of shit, but I also feel lucky. You want to know what Joe used to say to me? He used to say, "You have eyes, but you don't see." Then the dirty little America hater (and he was, too) would give me a psychotic’s giggle. I have eyes but I don't see? If he's who I think he is, maybe I've got a chance to make one of the most evil characters that’s ever lived eat his words.

And I'm going for it.

Also, domo arigatou for the sympathy on my monitor.

So sayeth Hassan

Monday, August 01, 2005

Dear LG:

How are you? I’ve been having my ups and down. I mean things aren’t bad, it's just I’ve been dealing with a lot of situations that occupy my time, reading and writing mostly. I don’t even go to the movies or watch TV now because I’m focused on getting the cash flow moving with the writing.

And it turns out I’m posting stories on My Space and that keeps me busy. I’m cultivating a group of readers who like what I do and are happy to see new stories. That’s something I’d like to keep going, the theory being I’m creating a fan base willing to read my stuff in magazine or in book form eventually. That’s the theory at least.

So you covered a lot of important points in your last two emails, and I’ve been walking around writing responses in my head. Those two major issues, what to do about Moslem immigration and CAFTA are things I also have strong opinions about. And I knew my responses would turn into lengthy spiels.

For example, your opinion that the Koran is a blueprint for spreading Islam through the world by violence, and that all Moslems are just 'one click' away for turning radical – well, I read the Koran about ten years ago and maybe it was my translation, but that violence stuff, which is there, wasn’t what really stood out. Actually what seemed more prominent was this Arab obsession with doing business, and how being successful in business was a sign of God’s favor. Over all, the Koran struck me as a mish mash of a lot of different ideas, one surah seeming to contract what another said.

So I came away from the Koran thinking Mohammed’s innovation was telling the desert peoples he confronted, “We can do war, or we can do business. It’s up to you, Hassan ol’ buddy.” And of course that was business on Mohammed’s terms, and if I didn’t like it, well where’s my scimitar? And today with Islam, I don’t think things and people are really all that different. I keep this in mind - most people in the world don’t have a stomach for violence. So if all the America people came across with a hard-ass attitude towards the Jihadists, most Moslems would default with, “Oh, okay. Can we do business?”

Victor Davis Hanson made an interesting point in one of his recent NRO articles when he said we should notice how Islamic terrorists don’t target the Chinese. The Chinese are ever more secular than us, and they have an atheistic system (which should make them prime targets for bin Laden’s distain). So why doesn’t Al Qeada fly planes into buildings in Singapore? Because then the Red Army would send death squads after Al Qeada that would murder them like the dogs that they are (my opinion) or worse (think nukes, the good professor's opinion).

And that tells me Al Qeada and Wahhabism are movements made up of sniveling little cowards because really, they’re great when it comes to killing woman or children, and they have no problem taking on a nation such as ours where they know we’ll act with some measure of restraint. But notice how they stay away from the Chinese who don’t give two shits what the world thinks (think Tibet).

Personally I see the mistake in the ‘one click’ attitude coming from assuming Islam has a monolithic, organizing principal that works, and I don’t see it. One of the great dreams of Arab loud mouths from Nasser to Arafat to Saddam was being able to unite the Arab peoples under this banner or that, (like pan Abrabism) and they all failed! Bin Laden is just the latest in a line of these criminals with delusions of grandeur. I don’t see anybody uniting anything with Islam (these old boys are just as likely to fight amongst themselves). And when it comes down to it, I’m of the opinion suicide bombers are simply how Jihadists get rid of their gays.

So as strange as this might sound, it’s not Moslems that worry me. It’s the Marxists and socialists and leftists who apologize for the terrorists, and in some cases give them cover, because without them the Jihadists are strictly nowhere. When Jihadists pay attention to the pathology of a leftwing idiot like Michael Moore (and you know they pay attention, see bin Laden’s last video) they think, “Ah ha, non defiling infidel. The worldwide insurgency has made in roads into the non-Moslem world. We are encouraged and shall continue.” But find ways to dry up that support and bin Laden goes back to getting high sniffing the fingers on his left hand.

That’s where the problem is. If by some miracle the West united in a desire to ‘Kill Jihadists’, terrorism would end tomorrow. If we were more like the Chinese, the terrorists would leave us alone. But that’s not going to happen. We’re more likely to see ‘The Dick Durbin Show’ on Al Jaeezera first.

(And just as a conspiracy theory aside – and I’m good at this – maybe the real reason Al Qeada leaves the Chinese alone is the Communists, along with all the other Marxists, are in bed with Al Qeada. I mean, which country makes most of the weapons the terrorist’s use, huh? "Can we do business?” I’ll betcha 60 Minutes isn't looking into that).

So as you can see, this email is totally out of control. Tears of laughter are hitting my desk and making a flood and whoa, there goes my keyboard. Okay, so the next time I’ll take on CAFTA and I’m sure you’re going to love those opinions, too. Be that as it may, I hope the family and you are doing well. Take care, and I’ll talk to you shortly.

Hassan

Saturday, May 21, 2005

The following post was sent to Mr. Donald Trump 05/21/05


Dear Mr. Trump:


Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes

You have the right idea.

Hassan